Debate FAQs

Question 1

What kind of output does Debate provide?

Accepted Answer

Debate synthesizes its findings into a structured output to prevent AI from smoothing over real disagreements. This includes a clear Recommendation, the Crux of Disagreement, 'What Would Falsify' the recommendation, and a comparison of the Risk of Acting vs. Waiting, giving you actionable insights.

Question 2

What types of plans or decisions are best suited for Debate?

Accepted Answer

Debate is ideal for complex, high-stakes decisions where finding potential weaknesses is critical. This includes areas such as legal decisions, financial planning, business strategy, architecture choices, investment analysis, contract terms, hiring decisions, and production deployments. It's not suited for simple lookups or routine tasks.

Question 3

Can I use different LLMs with Debate, and what are the requirements?

Accepted Answer

Yes, Debate is highly configurable. The Skeptic role works with any OpenAI-compatible API (e.g., Grok, Groq, Ollama, Mistral) by changing the base URL. The Steelman role defaults to Gemini but can also use OpenAI-compatible providers. You are responsible for bringing your own API keys for the LLM providers you choose, as Debate calls them directly.

Question 4

What is Debate and how does it help stress-test decisions?

Accepted Answer

Debate is an MCP server that orchestrates adversarial AI debates between advanced language models like OpenAI's GPT and Google's Gemini. It rigorously stress-tests your plans and decisions by having a 'Skeptic' model aggressively attack and a 'Steelman' model defend, all grounded in live web search data to identify potential flaws before you commit.

Question 5

How does Debate ensure unbiased and accurate evaluations?

Accepted Answer

Debate incorporates several research-backed features: asymmetric AI roles (Skeptic vs. Steelman) for comprehensive analysis, anonymized cross-examination between models to prevent identity bias, and web search grounding for factual verification. It can also specifically attack your current leanings to counter confirmation bias, ensuring a truly objective assessment.

Debate

Debate

Características Principales

Casos de Uso

Características Principales

Casos de Uso