How does the scoring system work?

The skill evaluates documents on a 0-100 scale, assigning up to 25 points each for Accuracy, Completeness, Relevance, and Actionability.

How do I trigger an audit?

You can trigger the skill by using keywords like 'SOW review', 'Spec review', or 'document review' within your Claude Code environment.

What is considered a passing score?

A score of 90-100 is a PASS, 70-89 is CONDITIONAL (requires fixes), and 0-69 is a FAIL requiring major revisions.

Can I use this for architectural design reviews?

Yes, it is specifically designed for design reviews, SOWs, and technical specifications to ensure they are actionable and comprehensive.

What do the confidence markers mean?

The skill uses ✓ for verified facts, → for inferences, and ? for gaps or unknowns to clarify the evidence behind the evaluation.

Document Formatting Audit & Scoring

Name: Document Formatting Audit & Scoring
Author: thkt

bythkt

•

Herramientas de Colaboración

Evaluates technical specifications and SOW documents using a standardized 100-point scoring system to ensure project readiness.

Acerca de

The formatting-audits skill provides a rigorous framework for evaluating the quality of Statements of Work (SOW) and technical specification documents. By scoring documents across four critical dimensions—Accuracy, Completeness, Relevance, and Actionability—it provides objective feedback on whether a project is ready for implementation. The skill utilizes confidence markers (✓/→/?) to distinguish between factual evidence and inferences, helping teams identify risks, dependencies, and gaps in test coverage before a single line of code is written.

Características Principales

100-point scoring system based on four key quality metrics
Automated SOW and Spec consistency checking
Confidence markers (✓/→/?) for evidence-based evaluation
Pass/Fail/Conditional logic for project phase gates
3 GitHub stars
Categorized feedback for required vs. recommended modifications

Casos de Uso

Reviewing Statements of Work (SOW) to ensure all acceptance criteria are testable
Validating the alignment between high-level business goals and proposed technical solutions
Auditing technical specifications for completeness before starting development

Acerca de

Características Principales

100-point scoring system based on four key quality metrics
Automated SOW and Spec consistency checking
Confidence markers (✓/→/?) for evidence-based evaluation
Pass/Fail/Conditional logic for project phase gates
3 GitHub stars
Categorized feedback for required vs. recommended modifications

Casos de Uso

Reviewing Statements of Work (SOW) to ensure all acceptance criteria are testable
Validating the alignment between high-level business goals and proposed technical solutions
Auditing technical specifications for completeness before starting development