When should I use this skill instead of a simple check?

Use this skill when you need more than a binary pass/fail result, specifically when multiple factors must be weighed together to make a nuanced decision.

Can this skill be integrated into other Claude Code skills?

Yes, it is designed to be a dependency. You can include it in your skill's frontmatter to leverage its evaluation patterns for specific domain tasks.

How do I define scoring criteria in this framework?

You define criteria by name, assign a weight (summing to 1.0), and provide a scoring guide that maps numeric ranges to qualitative assessments like 'Strong' or 'Weak'.

What are decision thresholds?

Decision thresholds are predefined score ranges that trigger specific actions, such as 'Approve immediately' for high scores or 'Request changes' for mid-range scores.

What is the Evaluation Framework skill for Claude Code?

It is a specialized capability that provides a structured approach to creating scoring systems and decision-making workflows using weighted criteria and thresholds.

Evaluation Framework

Name: Evaluation Framework
Author: micsapp

bymicsapp

0•

Herramientas para Desarrolladores

Implements structured scoring systems and decision-making frameworks for evaluating artifacts, code quality, and project proposals.

The Evaluation Framework skill provides a standardized, domain-agnostic methodology for building weighted scoring systems and threshold-based decision engines. It enables developers to define custom criteria, assign relative weights, and establish clear scoring rubrics to automate quality gates or prioritize tasks. By abstracting the logic of 'define, score, and decide,' this skill ensures consistent and objective evaluations across code reviews, resource allocation, and content assessments.

Características Principales

01Consistent scoring guides from exceptional to poor ratings

020 GitHub stars

03Reusable patterns for quality gates and assessment tools

04Weighted scoring methodology for multi-factor analysis

05Configurable evaluation criteria with descriptive rubrics

06Threshold-based decision logic for automated actions

Casos de Uso

01Automated code review quality gates and PR approval workflows

02Project backlog prioritization and resource allocation decisions

03Standardized content quality assessment for documentation and knowledge bases

Características Principales

01Consistent scoring guides from exceptional to poor ratings

020 GitHub stars

03Reusable patterns for quality gates and assessment tools

04Weighted scoring methodology for multi-factor analysis

05Configurable evaluation criteria with descriptive rubrics

06Threshold-based decision logic for automated actions

Casos de Uso

01Automated code review quality gates and PR approval workflows

02Project backlog prioritization and resource allocation decisions

03Standardized content quality assessment for documentation and knowledge bases