Does it support custom project rules?

Yes, it cross-references your project's @/openspec/AGENTS.md file to ensure the proposal aligns with your specific local conventions and architecture.

What kind of feedback does it provide?

It generates a structured report categorizing issues as Critical, Major, or Minor, followed by a final verdict such as Approved or Needs Revision.

Can it handle Chinese language input?

Yes, the skill is specifically configured to use Chinese for its review output and interactions, while maintaining technical terms in English.

What is the OpenSpec Proposal Reviewer?

It is a specialized Claude Code skill that audits technical specifications and proposals for completeness, clarity, and implementation readiness.

When should I use this skill?

Ideally, use it after generating an OpenSpec proposal but before starting implementation to ensure all requirements, risks, and edge cases are addressed.

OpenSpec Proposal Reviewer

Name: OpenSpec Proposal Reviewer
Author: cyber-echo

bycyber-echo

Herramientas de Colaboración

Reviews technical specifications and change proposals within the OpenSpec ecosystem to ensure implementation readiness and quality.

Acerca de

The OpenSpec Proposal Reviewer acts as an expert requirements engineer and technical writer, systematically evaluating OpenSpec-generated documents for clarity, feasibility, and impact. By providing a structured feedback loop with categorized severity levels—from Minor suggestions to Critical blockers—it helps development teams identify missing edge cases, assess breaking changes, and validate acceptance criteria before coding begins. This skill ensures that every proposal is actionable, follows project-specific conventions from AGENTS.md, and maintains a high standard of documentation within the repository.

Características Principales

Systematic validation of OpenSpec document structure and frontmatter compliance
Deep technical analysis of proposed solutions, dependencies, and architectural impacts
0 GitHub stars
Automated risk assessment identifying potential breaking changes and migration paths
Quality evaluation of acceptance criteria to ensure measurable and verifiable outcomes
Categorized feedback with a final verdict (Approved, Needs Revision, or Rejected)

Casos de Uso

Auditing existing documentation in the openspec/changes/ directory for technical consistency
Reviewing automatically generated change proposals to ensure no critical edge cases were missed
Validating a newly generated feature proposal before starting the implementation phase

Acerca de

Características Principales

Systematic validation of OpenSpec document structure and frontmatter compliance
Deep technical analysis of proposed solutions, dependencies, and architectural impacts
0 GitHub stars
Automated risk assessment identifying potential breaking changes and migration paths
Quality evaluation of acceptance criteria to ensure measurable and verifiable outcomes
Categorized feedback with a final verdict (Approved, Needs Revision, or Rejected)

Casos de Uso

Auditing existing documentation in the openspec/changes/ directory for technical consistency
Reviewing automatically generated change proposals to ensure no critical edge cases were missed
Validating a newly generated feature proposal before starting the implementation phase