Conectar

PoPS Manuscript Revision Guide

brycewang-stanfordbybrycewang-stanford
•
1.1k
•
Aprendizaje y Documentación

Guides academic authors in triaging peer review feedback and drafting point-by-point revision response letters for Perspectives on Psychological Science.

PoPS Manuscript Revision Guide is a specialized skill designed to help researchers navigate decision letters from Perspectives on Psychological Science (PoPS). Unlike primary-research rebuttal tools, this skill categorizes conceptual feedback into specific buckets—such as theoretical scope, literature coverage gaps, camp balance, appraisal accuracy, and open science compliance. It provides actionable strategies for steelmanning opposing viewpoints, integrating missing scholarship into organizing frameworks, and drafting rigorous point-by-point response letters without diluting the core thesis.

Características Principales

01Feedback triaging across 7 core perspective-paper categories
02Systematic integration workflows for addressing reviewer literature coverage gaps
031,086 GitHub stars
04Standardized point-by-point author response letter drafting with page/section tracking
05Steelman response generation for balance and theoretical fairness complaints
06Open science compliance verification for code, data, and protocol registrations

Casos de Uso

01Resolving referee accusations of theoretical imbalance or missing literature in review articles
02Revising an annotated-style manuscript into a coherent, high-impact conceptual perspective
03Drafting a point-by-point author response letter to a PoPS major revision or R&R decision