Does this skill modify my LaTeX files directly?

No, it focuses on drafting the response documents and tracking changes. It identifies where changes are needed, but actual manuscript edits are handled by the user or a separate writing agent to ensure total control.

What file formats does it support for reviewer comments?

It can process direct text input, uploaded text files, or paths to specific files within your project repository, such as reviewer-1.txt.

What happens if I disagree with a reviewer's point?

The skill is programmed to draft a 'Misunderstanding' response which clarifies the paper's position respectfully, provides supporting evidence, and suggests text improvements to prevent future confusion.

Can I use this for multiple reviewers at once?

Yes, it creates individual response files for each reviewer (e.g., reviewer-1-response.md, reviewer-2-response.md) and compiles a master revision changelog.

How does the skill classify reviewer comments?

It analyzes the sentiment and content of each comment to categorize it as Major (substantive concerns), Minor (clarity issues), Typo (formatting/grammar), or Misunderstanding (reviewer error requiring clarification).

Academic Rebuttal Manager

Name: Academic Rebuttal Manager
Author: jacazjx

byjacazjx

•

学習とドキュメンテーション

Generates structured, professional rebuttals for peer review comments by classifying feedback and drafting evidence-backed responses.

The Academic Rebuttal Manager is a specialized workflow tool designed for researchers and scientists to navigate the peer-review process efficiently. It automatically parses reviewer feedback, categorizes comments into Major, Minor, Typo, or Misunderstanding buckets, and drafts polite, non-defensive responses mapped to specific manuscript changes. By integrating directly with your LaTeX source files and experimental data, it ensures that every claim is supported by evidence and that all reviewer concerns are systematically addressed in a format ready for submission to top-tier journals and conferences.

主な機能

01Meta-review summary creation for editors and area chairs

02Professional tone optimization to ensure respectful and non-defensive communication

03Automatic classification of reviewer comments by priority and type

041 GitHub stars

05Evidence-backed response drafting with specific section and line citations

06Comprehensive revision changelog generation for manuscript tracking

ユースケース

01Preparing formal response letters for journal revisions (e.g., Nature, IEEE)

02Responding to conference reviews for venues like NeurIPS, ICLR, or CVPR

03Managing large volumes of feedback across multiple reviewers and revision cycles

主な機能

01Meta-review summary creation for editors and area chairs

02Professional tone optimization to ensure respectful and non-defensive communication

03Automatic classification of reviewer comments by priority and type

041 GitHub stars

05Evidence-backed response drafting with specific section and line citations

06Comprehensive revision changelog generation for manuscript tracking

ユースケース

01Preparing formal response letters for journal revisions (e.g., Nature, IEEE)

02Responding to conference reviews for venues like NeurIPS, ICLR, or CVPR

03Managing large volumes of feedback across multiple reviewers and revision cycles