Does the debate use real-time information?

Yes, during the first phase (Research), the agents use WebSearch to gather current data and knowledge to support their respective arguments.

Can I use this for technical decision-making?

Absolutely. It is highly effective for evaluating different architectural patterns, coding standards, or project strategies by simulating a peer review process.

How many participants are involved in the debate?

The skill orchestrates three distinct AI personas, each assigned a unique perspective or viewpoint on the topic to ensure a diverse and comprehensive discussion.

What happens if the AI agents cannot reach a consensus?

If there are unresolved issues after three rounds, the skill uses the AskUserQuestion tool to present the conflicting viewpoints to the user for a final judgment.

Aggressive Debate

Name: Aggressive Debate
Author: chkim-su

bychkim-su

生産性とワークフロー

Orchestrates a rigorous three-round debate between three AI personas to reach a reasoned consensus on complex topics.

概要

The Aggressive Debate skill transforms Claude into a powerful brainstorming and decision-making engine by simulating a 3-way intellectual confrontation. By assigning distinct perspectives to three separate sub-agents, the skill conducts automated web research, executes three rounds of structured rebuttals, and identifies points of agreement and contention. This multi-perspective approach is ideal for analyzing complex propositions, challenging biases, and uncovering deep insights that a single-turn conversation might miss.

主な機能

Multi-agent orchestration with three distinct viewpoints
Structured 3-round debate flow with perspective rotation
Parallel automated web research for evidence-based arguments
Consensus-driven synthesis of debate outcomes
Interactive resolution for unresolved points via user feedback
0 GitHub stars

ユースケース

Deep-diving into complex news topics or emerging technologies with evidence-backed reasoning
Vetting business strategies or technical architectures through 'devil's advocate' simulations
Analyzing ethical dilemmas or philosophical propositions from multiple angles

概要

主な機能

Multi-agent orchestration with three distinct viewpoints
Structured 3-round debate flow with perspective rotation
Parallel automated web research for evidence-based arguments
Consensus-driven synthesis of debate outcomes
Interactive resolution for unresolved points via user feedback
0 GitHub stars

ユースケース

Deep-diving into complex news topics or emerging technologies with evidence-backed reasoning
Vetting business strategies or technical architectures through 'devil's advocate' simulations
Analyzing ethical dilemmas or philosophical propositions from multiple angles