How does this skill differ from a standard AI code reviewer?

While most AI tools focus on writing reviews, this skill is specifically designed to evaluate the feedback you have already received, acting as a secondary filter to ensure suggestions are objectively valid.

Does this skill write code changes automatically?

No, its primary purpose is evaluation and decision-making support. Once a decision is made to 'Accept', you can then use Claude to implement the verified changes.

What principles does the skill use to judge feedback?

It uses a hierarchy of priorities starting with objective principles like Clean Code and SOLID, followed by actual code behavior, feedback content, and finally user preferences.

Can it help me handle disagreements in Pull Requests?

Yes. It provides a 'Negotiate' or 'Reject' path that includes a clear, principle-based rationale you can use to explain your position to teammates.

Is it possible to customize the evaluation criteria?

The skill references specific markdown files for criteria and principles, allowing you to align its logic with your specific project's architectural standards.

Critical Acceptance Evaluator

Name: Critical Acceptance Evaluator
Author: jhleee

byjhleee

0•

コラボレーションツール

Evaluates code review feedback against objective programming principles to help developers determine whether to accept, reject, or negotiate suggestions.

The Critical Acceptance skill empowers developers to move beyond blind compliance with code reviews by assessing feedback through a lens of objective technical standards. By prioritizing Clean Code, SOLID principles, and actual code behavior over subjective preferences, this skill analyzes the validity of PR comments to ensure only high-quality improvements are merged. It provides a structured framework to validate intent, check for technical accuracy, and generate logical rationales for decisions, making it an essential tool for maintaining architectural integrity and navigating complex team discussions.

主な機能

01Objective principles-based assessment (SOLID, Clean Code, DRY)

02Evidence-based rationale generation for feedback responses

03Intent-driven code behavior analysis

04Project-specific architecture and consistency validation

05Structured decision framework for accepting, rejecting, or negotiating

060 GitHub stars

ユースケース

01Evaluating whether a reviewer's suggestion aligns with existing project architecture

02Generating professional justifications for rejecting subjective or incorrect review comments

03Determining if a proposed refactoring actually improves maintainability or adds technical debt

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add jhleee/cc-useful critical-acceptance

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT

Download Skill