Can I add more than two teams to the debate?

Yes, you can configure additional teams including Green (Pragmatic/Implementation), Yellow (Risk/Safety), and Purple (Synthesis/Integration) to broaden the scope of the review.

Does this skill modify my source code during the debate?

No, the subagents are explicitly configured with read-only tools. They can research your code and documentation but cannot make modifications.

Where are the debate results stored?

All arguments, rebuttals, and conclusions are saved in a structured Markdown file within a dedicated './debates/' directory in your project.

How do I start a new debate session?

You can initiate the workflow by using the command '/debate {topic}' within your Claude Code environment.

What is a 'Red vs. Blue' debate in this context?

It is a structured exercise where the Red Team acts as the skeptic or challenger of a proposal, while the Blue Team acts as the advocate or defender, ensuring all pros and cons are surfaced.

Debate Orchestrator

Name: Debate Orchestrator
Author: srnnkls

bysrnnkls

コラボレーションツール

Orchestrates structured multi-perspective technical debates using adversarial AI subagents to evaluate architectural trade-offs and technology choices.

概要

The Debate Orchestrator skill enables developers to stress-test ideas by spawning autonomous subagents that represent diverse perspectives, such as Red (skeptic), Blue (advocate), and Green (pragmatic) teams. It automates a rigorous, multi-step adversarial process—including parallel research, evidence-backed argumentation, and sequential rebuttals—all coordinated via a centralized scratchpad. This is an essential tool for high-stakes decision-making, allowing teams to uncover hidden risks, validate architectural assumptions, and reach a documented consensus before writing a single line of production code.

主な機能

Automated moderator patterns to ensure debate health, depth, and relevance
0 GitHub stars
Synthesis rounds to identify common ground and actionable recommendations
Parallel subagent research phases using web search and codebase analysis
Multi-team configuration including Red, Blue, Green, Yellow, and Purple perspectives
Structured scratchpad logging in Markdown for persistent decision records

ユースケース

Comparing third-party libraries or frameworks for specific project requirements
Evaluating competing architectural patterns (e.g., Microservices vs. Monolith)
Conducting 'Devil's Advocate' risk analysis for security-sensitive features

概要

主な機能

Automated moderator patterns to ensure debate health, depth, and relevance
0 GitHub stars
Synthesis rounds to identify common ground and actionable recommendations
Parallel subagent research phases using web search and codebase analysis
Multi-team configuration including Red, Blue, Green, Yellow, and Purple perspectives
Structured scratchpad logging in Markdown for persistent decision records

ユースケース

Comparing third-party libraries or frameworks for specific project requirements
Evaluating competing architectural patterns (e.g., Microservices vs. Monolith)
Conducting 'Devil's Advocate' risk analysis for security-sensitive features