FSE Review Process Guide
Guides software engineering researchers through the ESEC/FSE peer review process, decision models, and revision strategies.
The FSE Review Process skill models the peer review workflow of the ACM International Conference on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE and PACMSE). It guides researchers through understanding double-anonymous evaluation criteria, decoding Accept, Major Revision, and Reject decisions, and drafting effective, anonymous revise-and-resubmit response letters. Designed for academic authors navigating software engineering publication tracks, this skill helps align empirical papers with reviewer expectations and avoid common revision mistakes.
主な機能
01Compares review mechanics and timelines across FSE, ICSE, and ISSTA conferences
021,079 GitHub stars
03Enforces double-anonymous compliance and prevents identity leaks during rebuttal rounds
04Breaks down FSE's journal-style PACMSE review model and multi-reviewer scoring
05Maps review feedback directly to core SE criteria like soundness, threats to validity, and artifacts
06Provides actionable response strategies for Major Revision and borderline outcomes
ユースケース
01Navigating a Major Revision decision under PACMSE guidelines to maximize second-round acceptance chances
02Structuring a pre-submission empirical software engineering paper to ensure gaps are easily repairable in revision
03Deconstructing an FSE review packet to build a prioritized, point-by-point response plan