Can it fix my bibliography errors?

It flags undefined citation keys and suspicious naming by checking your draft against your .bib file, but it does not automatically add new sources or citations from the web.

What is a global consistency review?

It is a comprehensive check that ensures all parts of a document use the same definitions, follow the same taxonomy, and work together as a single, coherent argument rather than a collection of separate sections.

Does this skill write new content for my paper?

No. The Global Reviewer focuses on coherence, terminology, and evidence verification. It is designed to prevent 'hollow writing' and will flag missing information rather than inventing facts.

How does it handle missing evidence?

It treats missing evidence as a failure signal. Instead of 'writing around' the gap, it generates TODOs and routes the issue back to earlier pipeline stages for fact-finding.

When should I run the Global Reviewer skill?

Use this skill when your draft is complete and you want a final pass for coherence and evidence-first integrity before converting to a final format like LaTeX or PDF.

Global Reviewer

Name: Global Reviewer
Author: WILLOSCAR

byWILLOSCAR

•

コンテンツ管理

Performs comprehensive consistency audits and coherence reviews for academic survey drafts and technical manuscripts.

概要

Global Reviewer acts as a specialized auditor for complex documents, ensuring that terminology remains consistent across all sections and that the narrative follows a logical, evidence-backed argument chain. It cross-references drafts against taxonomies, mappings, and citation libraries to catch scope drift or 'stitched-together' writing styles. By providing an evidence-first methodology, it serves as a final quality gate before publication, flagging missing evidence and placeholder leakage without inventing facts or citations.

主な機能

Verification of citation keys against bibliography databases
Evidence-to-claim verification using structured mapping matrices
89 GitHub stars
Detection and removal of 'planner talk' and placeholder leakage
Automated cross-section terminology and taxonomy consistency checks
Generation of actionable, bullets-first audit reports with status flags

ユースケース

Auditing technical documentation for consistent terminology and scope
Final review of a multi-author research survey before LaTeX conversion
Ensuring narrative bridges and logical flow between independently drafted chapters

概要

主な機能

Verification of citation keys against bibliography databases
Evidence-to-claim verification using structured mapping matrices
89 GitHub stars
Detection and removal of 'planner talk' and placeholder leakage
Automated cross-section terminology and taxonomy consistency checks
Generation of actionable, bullets-first audit reports with status flags

ユースケース

Auditing technical documentation for consistent terminology and scope
Final review of a multi-author research survey before LaTeX conversion
Ensuring narrative bridges and logical flow between independently drafted chapters