How does this skill identify methodological tensions?

The skill compares your declared stance in your configuration files against your recent chat history, analytical decisions, and specific vocabulary choices to highlight contradictions.

Which philosophical stances does the skill support?

It is designed to work with common qualitative frameworks including Constructivism, Objectivism, Critical Realism, and Systematic Interpretation.

Can this skill help with AI-assisted coding?

Yes, it specifically monitors whether you are using the AI as an epistemic partner or an interpretive aid, ensuring your usage matches your declared research methodology.

What is the purpose of a coherence check in qualitative research?

A coherence check ensures that your research actions, language, and methods are logically consistent with your underlying philosophical assumptions (ontology and epistemology).

Methodological Coherence Check

Name: Methodological Coherence Check
Author: linxule

bylinxule

•

データサイエンスとML

Validates alignment between research epistemology, ontology, and analytical practice to ensure rigorous qualitative research outcomes.

The Methodological Coherence Check skill acts as an epistemic monitor for researchers using Claude Code for qualitative analysis. It systematically audits the alignment between a user's declared philosophical stance (such as Constructivism or Objectivism) and their actual linguistic choices, analytical methods, and relationship with AI. By flagging tensions—like using objectivist terminology while claiming a constructivist framework—the skill helps researchers maintain theoretical integrity and reflexive awareness, preventing unexamined methodological drift during the interpretive process.

主な機能

01Audits the alignment between analytical methods and epistemology

02Detects theoretical tensions in real-time or upon manual invocation

032 GitHub stars

04Analyzes linguistic patterns for consistency with declared philosophical frameworks

05Provides actionable recommendations for reconciling methodological drift

06Evaluates the researcher-AI relationship to ensure adherence to defined roles

ユースケース

01Checking for consistency when transitioning between different phases of a qualitative study

02Verifying that analytical language remains consistent with a specific research tradition like Grounded Theory or Phenomenology

03Ensuring AI-assisted coding practices align with the researcher's role as an interpretive lead

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add linxule/interpretive-orchestration coherence-check

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT

Download Skill