Does it handle technical test coverage?

While it checks for testable acceptance criteria, deep AC-FR traceability and detailed test coverage are typically delegated to the 'validating-specs' skill.

Can it identify unnecessary project features?

Yes, it specifically monitors for YAGNI (You Ain't Gonna Need It) violations and applies point deductions for scope creep or irrelevant solutions.

What documents can this skill audit?

It is primarily designed for technical specifications, design documents, and Statements of Work (SOW) to ensure they are ready for development.

How does the scoring system work?

It uses a 100-point scale evaluating Accuracy, Completeness, Relevance, and Actionability, with 25 points allocated to each category based on specific criteria.

What happens if a document fails the audit?

Documents scoring below 70 receive a FAIL judgment, signaling that major revisions are needed. Scores between 70-89 require a re-review after specific fixes.

Spec & SOW Quality Auditor

Name: Spec & SOW Quality Auditor
Author: thkt

bythkt

•

コラボレーションツール

Performs automated 100-point quality assessments for technical specifications and Statement of Work (SOW) documents to ensure accuracy and actionability.

This skill provides a rigorous, 100-point scoring framework for reviewing Statement of Work (SOW) and technical design specifications. It evaluates documents based on four critical pillars—Accuracy, Completeness, Relevance, and Actionability—while applying standardized deductions for common pitfalls like vague requirements, missing confidence markers, or YAGNI violations. Ideal for engineering leads and project managers, it streamlines the design review process by providing clear pass/fail thresholds and actionable feedback to improve documentation quality before the development phase begins.

主な機能

01Standardized Pass/Fail/Conditional thresholds for design reviews

028 GitHub stars

03100-point scoring system across four key quality metrics

04Traceability markers for evidence and confidence levels

05Automatic deductions for vague action items and missing sections

06Strict evaluation of YAGNI (You Ain't Gonna Need It) violations

ユースケース

01Auditing SOW documents for completeness, feasibility, and project readiness

02Standardizing quality benchmarks for internal team documentation and specifications

03Reviewing technical design documents before starting the implementation phase

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add thkt/dotclaude formatting-audits

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT