What makes systematic debugging better than traditional bug fixing?

Systematic debugging prevents 'thrashing' by requiring a confirmed root cause before any code is changed. This ensures that the underlying issue is resolved rather than just masking the symptoms with a temporary patch.

What happens if a fix attempt fails more than three times?

The framework triggers an architectural review, suggesting that the problem may be a fundamental design flaw rather than a simple coding error, and prompts a discussion with a human partner.

When should I use this skill?

Use this skill for any technical issue including test failures, production bugs, unexpected behavior, performance bottlenecks, or build failures, especially when you feel tempted to 'just try' a fix.

How does the four-phase framework work?

It guides the developer through Investigation (gathering evidence), Pattern Analysis (comparing with working code), Hypothesis (forming a theory), and Implementation (executing and verifying the fix).

Systematic Debugging Framework

Name: Systematic Debugging Framework
Author: udecode

byudecode

•

1,108

セキュリティとテスト

Applies a rigorous four-phase framework to identify root causes and implement stable fixes for complex software bugs and test failures.

概要

The Systematic Debugging skill transforms the way Claude approaches technical issues by enforcing a strict 'no fix without root cause' policy. By guiding the agent through evidence gathering, pattern analysis, and scientific hypothesis testing, it eliminates the 'guess-and-check' cycle that leads to technical debt. This skill is particularly valuable for resolving intermittent failures, complex data flow issues, and architectural bottlenecks where simple patches would fail.

主な機能

Multi-component diagnostic instrumentation for tracing errors across system boundaries
1,108 GitHub stars
Pattern analysis protocol to compare broken code against known working references
Strict four-phase debugging lifecycle: Investigation, Analysis, Hypothesis, and Implementation
Mandatory root cause verification before proposing any code changes
Automated architectural review triggers after multiple failed fix attempts

ユースケース

Resolving non-deterministic test failures or 'flaky' tests in CI/CD pipelines
Debugging complex data flow issues in multi-layered microservices architectures
Troubleshooting environmental or configuration-driven bugs in production environments

概要

主な機能

Multi-component diagnostic instrumentation for tracing errors across system boundaries
1,108 GitHub stars
Pattern analysis protocol to compare broken code against known working references
Strict four-phase debugging lifecycle: Investigation, Analysis, Hypothesis, and Implementation
Mandatory root cause verification before proposing any code changes
Automated architectural review triggers after multiple failed fix attempts

ユースケース

Resolving non-deterministic test failures or 'flaky' tests in CI/CD pipelines
Debugging complex data flow issues in multi-layered microservices architectures
Troubleshooting environmental or configuration-driven bugs in production environments