Why does this skill discourage saying 'thank you' during reviews?

It prioritizes technical action over performative social cues to maintain focus on code correctness and prevent conversational bloat within the development workflow.

What is the priority order for implementing review fixes?

It prioritizes blocking issues and security vulnerabilities first, followed by simple fixes like typos, and finally complex logic or refactoring tasks.

Can Claude push back on human suggestions with this skill?

Yes. If a suggestion is technically incorrect, breaks existing functionality, or violates YAGNI principles, the skill provides a reasoned, evidence-based pushback.

How does the skill handle unclear feedback items?

It pauses implementation entirely and requests specific clarification to ensure no errors are introduced through partial understanding or assumptions.

Technical Code Review Reception

Name: Technical Code Review Reception
Author: abudhahir

byabudhahir

コラボレーションツール

Manages code review feedback with technical rigor by prioritizing verification and clarity over performative agreement.

概要

This skill transforms how Claude handles code reviews by enforcing a strict 'verify before implementation' protocol. It prevents the common AI pitfall of blind agreement, ensuring that suggestions are technically sound, necessary for the specific codebase, and free of unnecessary 'YAGNI' features. By providing structured response patterns for both human partners and external reviewers, it shifts the focus from social pleasantries to technical acknowledgment and reasoned pushback when necessary.

主な機能

Multi-item feedback orchestration to ensure 100% clarity before implementation.
Integrated YAGNI checks to identify and question unnecessary feature bloat.
Technical verification protocol to prevent blind implementation of incorrect suggestions.
0 GitHub stars
Structured response patterns that eliminate performative agreement and redundant gratitude.
Context-aware skepticism for external reviewer suggestions vs. trusted partners.

ユースケース

Clarifying ambiguous or conflicting reviewer instructions before modifying the codebase.
Processing high-stakes PR feedback where technical accuracy is more important than speed.
Evaluating external contributions to ensure they align with existing architectural decisions.

概要

主な機能

Multi-item feedback orchestration to ensure 100% clarity before implementation.
Integrated YAGNI checks to identify and question unnecessary feature bloat.
Technical verification protocol to prevent blind implementation of incorrect suggestions.
0 GitHub stars
Structured response patterns that eliminate performative agreement and redundant gratitude.
Context-aware skepticism for external reviewer suggestions vs. trusted partners.

ユースケース

Clarifying ambiguous or conflicting reviewer instructions before modifying the codebase.
Processing high-stakes PR feedback where technical accuracy is more important than speed.
Evaluating external contributions to ensure they align with existing architectural decisions.