AMR Topic Selection

•
1.1k
•

Evaluates and refines theoretical research puzzles to assess conceptual fit for Academy of Management Review submissions.

AMR Topic Selection guides academic researchers and management scholars in stress-testing paper concepts against the rigorous standards of the Academy of Management Review (AMR). The skill evaluates whether an observed phenomenon constitutes a genuine theoretical puzzle—such as a theoretical contradiction, boundary condition failure, or construct ambiguity—rather than a mere empirical gap or routine literature survey. By walking through structured diagnostic worksheets and anti-pattern checklists, it ensures that ideas represent focused, non-empirical, refutable theoretical contributions before researchers invest time in full theory development.

주요 기능

01Distinguishes authentic theoretical puzzles from standard empirical gaps
021,069 GitHub stars
03Categorizes theoretical tensions across six recognized conceptual puzzle types
04Includes a structured worksheet to translate observed phenomena into theoretical questions
05Evaluates manuscript ideas against formal AMR conceptual fit and scope criteria
06Screens out common desk-reject pitfalls like empirical framing or incremental contributions

사용 사례

01Validating early-stage research outlines to prevent desk rejection at AMR
02Assessing whether an organizational phenomenon is theory-worthy for top-tier conceptual journals
03Reframing an empirical study idea into a purely theoretical contribution