Can I customize the perspectives involved in the debate?

Yes, you can configure the number and types of perspectives, ranging from a default set (Security, Performance, Simplicity) to comprehensive sets including Scalability and Cost.

What happens after a decision is made?

The skill provides implementation guidance and can use builder agents to begin executing the decided path, including setting up monitoring for success metrics.

Does this skill help with documentation?

Absolutely. It automatically generates a detailed decision record in your repository, including the full debate transcript, rationale, and implementation guidance.

How does the skill handle conflicting viewpoints?

It uses configurable convergence criteria such as synthesis, majority rule, or evidence-based ranking to reach a final, justified recommendation.

When should I use the Debate Workflow skill?

Use it for high-impact decisions like framework selection, major refactoring, or infrastructure changes where multiple valid approaches exist and require deep evaluation.

Architectural Debate Workflow

Name: Architectural Debate Workflow
Author: rysweet

byrysweet

•

생산성 및 워크플로

Facilitates structured multi-perspective debates among AI agents to resolve complex architectural trade-offs and technical decisions.

소개

The Debate Workflow skill enables Claude to conduct rigorous, multi-agent analysis for high-stakes engineering decisions. By simulating various expert perspectives—such as Security, Performance, and Cost—this skill breaks down complex problems into structured rounds of positioning, challenging, and synthesis. It is particularly useful for framework selection, major refactors, and system design choices where a single 'correct' answer isn't immediately obvious, ensuring all trade-offs are documented and evaluated before implementation to prevent long-term technical debt.

주요 기능

Simulates up to 7 expert agent perspectives including Security, Scalability, and Cost
Automatic generation of standardized Decision Records (ADRs) with full transcripts
Evidence-based argument tracking using specialized analyzer and architect agents
Multi-agent subprocess coordination to ensure unbiased and independent viewpoints
Configurable debate rounds ranging from quick positioning to deep synthesis cycles
16 GitHub stars

사용 사례

Documenting high-stakes infrastructure decisions for long-term stakeholder alignment
Resolving team disputes over testing strategies and technical debt management
Evaluating major architectural shifts like REST vs. GraphQL or Monolith vs. Microservices

소개

주요 기능

Simulates up to 7 expert agent perspectives including Security, Scalability, and Cost
Automatic generation of standardized Decision Records (ADRs) with full transcripts
Evidence-based argument tracking using specialized analyzer and architect agents
Multi-agent subprocess coordination to ensure unbiased and independent viewpoints
Configurable debate rounds ranging from quick positioning to deep synthesis cycles
16 GitHub stars

사용 사례

Documenting high-stakes infrastructure decisions for long-term stakeholder alignment
Resolving team disputes over testing strategies and technical debt management
Evaluating major architectural shifts like REST vs. GraphQL or Monolith vs. Microservices