ARPsych Review Balance & Coverage Audit
Audits Annual Review of Psychology manuscripts for even-handed coverage, methodological credibility weighting, and citation balance.
Designed for researchers authoring high-impact literature reviews, this skill evaluates psychology manuscript drafts against Annual Review of Psychology (ARPsych) editorial standards for balance, rigor, and objectivity. It audits citation distribution across competing research labs and paradigms, discourages simplistic vote-counting in favor of replication-informed evidence weighting (such as sample power, preregistration, and multi-site trials), prevents strawmanning of rival theories, and checks for excessive self-citation to produce authoritative reviews of record.
주요 기능
01Audits citation distribution across research labs and paradigms to eliminate coverage bias
02Detects excessive self-citation to maintain proportionality with the author's field standing
03Produces structured audit reports flagging replication hygiene, cell depth, and debate openness
04Ensures rival theories are presented at their strongest rather than strawmanned or dismissed
05Enforces credibility weighting based on replication status, sample diversity, and preregistration
061,069 GitHub stars
사용 사례
01Ensuring literature reviews fairly represent competing theoretical camps and multi-method paradigms
02Auditing draft Annual Review of Psychology manuscripts before editorial review submission
03Verifying that contested psychological effects and failed replications are accurately contextualized