JAE Review Process Guide
Navigates and interprets the Journal of Accounting and Economics review pipeline, editorial decisions, and conference submissions.
Designed for academic accounting and economics researchers, this skill provides actionable guidance for navigating the Journal of Accounting and Economics (JAE) submission and peer-review process. It clarifies JAE's compact editor-final decision model, desk-reject dynamics, double-anonymized review expectations, and high economics-relevance bar. Researchers can leverage this skill to decipher decision letters, prioritize editor feedback over reviewer comments, and explore the annual JAE Conference fast-track pipeline.
주요 기능
01Details expectations for empirical identification, mechanism testing, and robustness checks
02Provides frameworks for decoding decision letters and differentiating editor from reviewer priorities
031,079 GitHub stars
04Explains the JAE suitability screen, economics-relevance bar, and desk-reject criteria
05Provides standardized structured review summaries and actionable next steps
06Outlines submission strategies and timelines for the annual JAE Conference special-issue pipeline
사용 사례
01Assessing whether to submit research through the annual JAE Conference pipeline versus regular submission
02Evaluating paper fit and identification strategy prior to submitting to avoid desk rejection
03Interpreting a JAE decision letter to determine whether to prepare a revision or reposition for another journal