JOM Literature Positioning

•
1.1k
•

Positions Journal of Management manuscripts by framing theoretical gaps, problematizing assumptions, and differentiating from sibling academic journals.

The JOM Literature Positioning skill helps academic researchers stake robust theoretical contributions for Journal of Management (JOM) manuscripts. It guides authors through problematizing taken-for-granted assumptions rather than relying on weak gap-spotting, differentiating manuscripts from sibling journals such as AMJ, SMJ, JMS, and Org Science, and justifying the timing and value-add of systematic reviews or meta-analyses. By generating explicit contribution sentences that bridge the introduction and discussion, this skill helps eliminate desk-reject risks stemming from perceived incrementalism or misaligned scope.

주요 기능

01Problematizes core theoretical assumptions instead of weak setting-based gap-spotting
021,086 GitHub stars
03Integrates multi-subfield citations without diluting the primary focal conversation
04Structures clear timing and value-add arguments for meta-analyses and systematic reviews
05Formulates 2–4 precise contribution sentences connecting introduction to discussion
06Differentiates manuscript positioning from sibling journals like AMJ, SMJ, JMS, and Org Science

사용 사례

01Targeting a Journal of Management submission while distinguishing its scope from AMJ or SMJ
02Reframing an academic paper's introduction after reviewer feedback labeled the contribution incremental
03Positioning a management review or meta-analysis against existing literature syntheses