SIGIR Review Process Guide
Guides authors through the ACM SIGIR track-specific OpenReview workflows, evaluation scoring criteria, reviewer archetypes, and decision packet triage.
The SIGIR Review Process skill equips researchers with actionable knowledge about how ACM SIGIR evaluates submissions across full, short, resources, and reproducibility tracks. It models track-partitioned OpenReview workflows, reviewer expectations centered on rigorous evaluation validity rather than pure novelty, and common reviewer archetypes. Authors can audit their drafts against typical standing objections, navigate PC member nomination duties, decode score distributions, and systematically triage decision packets for effective rebuttals or strategic resubmissions.
주요 기능
01Provides auditing against core IR reviewer expectations such as baseline tuning and significance testing
02Ensures full compliance with the ACM Peer Review Policy, confidentiality standards, and PC nomination duties
03Structures decision packet triage to classify reviewer comments into factual errors, evidence gaps, and scope disputes
04Navigates track-specific OpenReview rules, including double-blind vs single-anonymous policies
05Profiles four key reviewer archetypes to eliminate framing vulnerabilities across evaluation and systems metrics
061,090 GitHub stars
사용 사례
01Interpreting meta-reviews and score distributions to decide between author rebuttal, camera-ready edits, or track re-routing
02Pre-submission self-auditing to verify experimental validity, baseline comparisons, and statistical testing standards
03Strategic planning for PC member reviewer nomination and tracking reviewer compliance across conference cycles