How does the skill handle methodological critique?

It performs a systematic audit of the study's validity and reliability, checking if the data provided actually supports the claims made in the discussion section.

What types of academic papers can this skill review?

The skill is designed for scholarly manuscripts across various disciplines, particularly those requiring rigorous methodological evaluation and contribution mapping for high-impact journals.

Can it help me target a specific journal like Nature or Science?

Yes, the skill includes quality calibration protocols to grade your manuscript based on the specific standards of target venues like Nature, Science, NEJM, or CVPR.

Does this skill help with citations?

It identifies missing seminal works in the field and flags potential issues with citation bias or over-citation of the author's own previous work.

Academic Peer Reviewer

Name: Academic Peer Reviewer
Author: poemswe

bypoemswe

•

Data Science & ML

Provides rigorous, PhD-level critiques of academic manuscripts and research methodologies to ensure high-impact scholarly standards.

About

The Peer Review skill transforms Claude into a specialized academic editor and reviewer with the clinical precision required for high-impact journals. It evaluates manuscripts across multiple dimensions including novelty, methodological soundness, and ethical compliance, providing structured feedback and actionable improvement paths. By employing a 'Third Voice' tone, the skill helps researchers identify fatal flaws, position their work within the existing literature landscape, and prepare for submissions to top-tier venues like Nature, Science, or specialized professional journals.

Key Features

Formal Reviewer Report generation with Accept/Reject decision logic
Dimensional evaluation of novelty, rigor, impact, and narrative clarity
Missing seminal work identification and citation balance analysis
10 GitHub stars
Systematic methodology audits to identify flaws in validity and reliability
Evidence alignment checks between results and discussion claims

Use Cases

Internal pre-submission review of manuscripts to increase acceptance probability
Critiquing research designs and methodological rigor during the drafting phase
Drafting strategic responses to external peer reviewer feedback

About

Key Features

Formal Reviewer Report generation with Accept/Reject decision logic
Dimensional evaluation of novelty, rigor, impact, and narrative clarity
Missing seminal work identification and citation balance analysis
10 GitHub stars
Systematic methodology audits to identify flaws in validity and reliability
Evidence alignment checks between results and discussion claims

Use Cases

Internal pre-submission review of manuscripts to increase acceptance probability
Critiquing research designs and methodological rigor during the drafting phase
Drafting strategic responses to external peer reviewer feedback