ACM CCS Review Process
Guides security researchers through the ACM CCS peer review lifecycle, rebuttal strategy, ethics scrutiny, and HotCRP workflows.
ACM CCS Review Process assists computer security researchers in navigating the rigorous ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS) publication pipeline. It provides actionable strategic frameworks across all submission phases—from formulating robust threat models and managing two-cycle HotCRP timelines to crafting laser-focused rebuttal responses, satisfying ethics reviews, and fulfilling shepherd revision checklists. This skill is ideal for academic researchers, PhD candidates, and security practitioners looking to optimize their submissions for top-tier computer security proceedings.
Key Features
01Threat model soundness and adaptive adversary defense evaluation
02Targeted rebuttal preparation for adversarial reviewer critiques
03Strategic HotCRP two-cycle workflow planning and decision tracking
04Ethics and responsible disclosure compliance guidance
05Minor revision and shepherd checklist execution support
061,069 GitHub stars
Use Cases
01Hardening research threat models and evidence against adversarial security reviews
02Executing shepherd requirements and minor revision checklists for camera-ready acceptance
03Drafting concise, impactful author rebuttals during the CCS review window