ACM CHI Review Process Guide
Navigates and interprets the ACM CHI Papers two-round review pipeline, recommendation scales, and desk-reject rubrics.
This skill guides HCI researchers through the nuances of the ACM CHI Papers peer review pipeline, including 1AC and 2AC committee roles, desk-reject (DR) and assisted desk-reject (ADR) criteria, and the A/ARR/RR/RRX/X scoring scale. It helps authors realistically evaluate round-1 meta-reviews and external scores against historical acceptance funnels, prioritize revision strategies during the five-week Revise and Resubmit (R&R) window, and navigate round-2 Program Committee decision dynamics effectively.
Key Features
01Decodes the 5-point ACM CHI recommendation scale across 1AC, 2AC, and external reviewers
02Synthesizes 1AC meta-reviews to highlight core committee concerns for revisions
03Evaluates desk-reject and rubric-based assisted desk-reject (ADR) risk factors
041,074 GitHub stars
05Calibrates paper acceptance odds against empirical conference funnel benchmarks
06Provides structured decision assessments for revising, reframing, or re-routing submissions
Use Cases
01Interpreting round-1 reviewer scores and 1AC meta-reviews to gauge revise-and-resubmit viability
02Screening pre-submission drafts for format compliance and assisted desk reject (ADR) pitfalls
03Planning a high-impact revision roadmap and response strategy during the five-week R&R window