Does this skill work with any repository?

Yes, as long as the repository uses Git for version control, the skill can generate the necessary SHAs to perform a review.

How should I handle feedback from the code-reviewer subagent?

Fix critical and important issues immediately. Minor issues can be noted for later. If the reviewer is technically incorrect, you should push back with reasoning or tests.

When is code review mandatory using this skill?

Review is mandatory after every task in subagent-driven development, after completing any major feature, and before merging changes into the main branch.

How does the skill know which code to review?

The skill uses Git SHAs (BASE_SHA and HEAD_SHA) to identify the specific range of changes that need analysis.

Can I use this for refactoring?

Absolutely. Requesting a review before and after refactoring provides a baseline check to ensure logic remains intact during the process.

AI Code Review Requester

Name: AI Code Review Requester
Author: anortham

byanortham

0•

Collaboration Tools

Facilitates systematic code reviews by dispatching specialized subagents to analyze changes and catch technical issues before they compound.

The AI Code Review Requester skill integrates automated, high-fidelity code reviews into the development lifecycle by leveraging specialized subagents. Designed for subagent-driven development and complex feature implementation, it allows Claude to define specific Git diffs and compare them against original requirements. By categorizing feedback into critical, important, and minor issues, it ensures that technical debt is addressed immediately and that logic remains sound across tasks, preventing the cascade of errors that often occur in long-running AI development sessions.

Key Features

01Precise diff analysis using Git commit SHAs

02Automated dispatch of the razorback:code-reviewer subagent

03Structured feedback loops for critical and important issues

04Integration with subagent-driven development workflows

05Support for requirement-based verification and plan compliance

060 GitHub stars

Use Cases

01Verifying individual task completion within a multi-step deployment plan

02Getting a fresh technical perspective when stuck on a complex bug or refactor

03Performing a final quality gate before merging a feature branch into main

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add anortham/razorback requesting-code-review

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT

Key Features

01Precise diff analysis using Git commit SHAs

02Automated dispatch of the razorback:code-reviewer subagent

03Structured feedback loops for critical and important issues

04Integration with subagent-driven development workflows

05Support for requirement-based verification and plan compliance

060 GitHub stars

Use Cases

01Verifying individual task completion within a multi-step deployment plan

02Getting a fresh technical perspective when stuck on a complex bug or refactor

03Performing a final quality gate before merging a feature branch into main

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add anortham/razorback requesting-code-review

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT