AMJ Topic Selection assists academic researchers in scoping, vetting, and pressure-testing research questions specifically for submission to the Academy of Management Journal (AMJ). It ensures that initial concepts go beyond naive gap-spotting by evaluating four core criteria: phenomenon grounding, theoretical mechanism, empirical feasibility, and conceptual tension. By mapping constructs to the appropriate AOM divisional homes (such as Micro/OB, Macro/Strategy, HR, Entrepreneurship, or OMT) and distinguishing AMJ fit from alternatives like AMR, ASQ, and SMJ, this skill helps scholars avoid non-starter ideas before investing significant time in data collection.
Key Features
01Generates structured fit verdicts to evaluate suitability against sibling journals like AMR
02Tests research topics across AMJ's four core empirical and theoretical fit criteria
031,069 GitHub stars
04Detects common academic submission anti-patterns such as simple gap-spotting
05Identifies appropriate AOM divisional homes and framing vocabulary
06Guides the transition from empirical phenomena to mechanistic why/when research questions
Use Cases
01Pressure-testing a new management dataset or phenomenon for AMJ publication viability
02Determining whether a manuscript idea belongs at AMJ versus AMR, ASQ, or SMJ
03Refining an observational or empirical research question prior to data collection
