What is the primary purpose of the review-output skill?

It defines a standardized structure and formatting rules for architectural review reports to ensure they are professional, consistent, and easy for team members to follow.

Does it include code examples in the review reports?

Yes, but only for complex cases. The skill follows a best practice of showing only the recommended approach rather than the problematic code to keep reports concise.

Who is the intended audience for the generated reports?

The reports are specifically formatted to be accessible to junior developers, focusing on explicit, unambiguous findings and avoiding unnecessary technical jargon.

How does the skill categorize architectural issues?

Issues are categorized by type (Design, Security, Performance, etc.) and ranked by severity: Critical, High, Medium, and Low, each requiring different levels of action.

Can this skill be used for daily code reviews?

While it can be adapted, it is primarily optimized for high-level architectural reviews of development plans and major implementation proposals.

Architectural Review Formatter

Name: Architectural Review Formatter
Author: mrstroz

bymrstroz

•

Collaboration Tools

Standardizes the generation of architectural review reports using a professional, structured template designed for clarity and actionable feedback.

About

The dev-plan review-output skill provides a rigorous framework for generating architectural review reports within Claude Code. It ensures that every review includes critical components like executive summaries, severity-based issue categorization (from Critical to Low), and concrete recommendations while maintaining a constructive tone suitable for junior developers. By enforcing a standardized structure, it helps teams maintain high architectural standards, reduce technical debt, and ensure consistency across complex development plans and implementation proposals.

Key Features

Standardized Markdown template for comprehensive architectural reporting
Structured feedback loops including executive summaries and positive aspects
Four-tier severity classification system for prioritized issue resolution
Dedicated consistency violation tracking with specific file references
1 GitHub stars
Built-in quality checklist to ensure professional and concise report delivery

Use Cases

Providing clear, jargon-free architectural guidance and mentorship for junior developers
Standardizing the review process across a multi-person engineering team to ensure quality
Generating formal feedback for complex development plans before implementation begins

About

Key Features

Standardized Markdown template for comprehensive architectural reporting
Structured feedback loops including executive summaries and positive aspects
Four-tier severity classification system for prioritized issue resolution
Dedicated consistency violation tracking with specific file references
1 GitHub stars
Built-in quality checklist to ensure professional and concise report delivery

Use Cases

Providing clear, jargon-free architectural guidance and mentorship for junior developers
Standardizing the review process across a multi-person engineering team to ensure quality
Generating formal feedback for complex development plans before implementation begins