Can I disagree with the AI code reviewer?

Yes. If the reviewer provides incorrect feedback, you are encouraged to push back with technical reasoning, code samples, or test results that prove your implementation is correct.

What should I do if the subagent identifies a 'Critical' issue?

Critical issues must be fixed immediately before proceeding with the workflow, as they represent fundamental flaws or bugs that could break the system.

When is it mandatory to use the requesting-code-review skill?

It is mandatory after completing each task in subagent-driven development, after implementing a major feature, and immediately before merging code into the main branch.

How does the skill track which code to review?

The skill uses Git SHAs, specifically a BASE_SHA and a HEAD_SHA, to define the exact range of commits the code-reviewer subagent should examine.

Automated Code Reviewer

Name: Automated Code Reviewer
Author: darthmolen

bydarthmolen

Collaboration Tools

Streamlines the code review process by dispatching specialized subagents to verify code quality and requirement adherence before merging.

About

The requesting-code-review skill standardizes how developers validate their work within Claude Code by automating the dispatch of a code-reviewer subagent. By utilizing Git SHAs to isolate specific changes, this skill ensures that every task or feature is evaluated against project requirements before it can cascade into larger issues. It facilitates a 'review early, review often' philosophy, allowing developers to catch critical bugs, improve code architecture, and maintain a high standard of quality throughout subagent-driven development workflows.

Key Features

Subagent-driven automated code analysis
0 GitHub stars
Seamless integration with task-based development plans
Template-based requirement verification
Git-based diff tracking using SHA comparisons
Prioritized feedback loops (Critical, Important, Minor)

Use Cases

Gaining a fresh technical perspective when stuck on complex refactoring
Verifying individual task completion in subagent-driven development
Performing final quality assurance checks before merging to the main branch

About

Key Features

Subagent-driven automated code analysis
0 GitHub stars
Seamless integration with task-based development plans
Template-based requirement verification
Git-based diff tracking using SHA comparisons
Prioritized feedback loops (Critical, Important, Minor)

Use Cases

Gaining a fresh technical perspective when stuck on complex refactoring
Verifying individual task completion in subagent-driven development
Performing final quality assurance checks before merging to the main branch