CEQ Literature Review & Positioning
Positions economics research papers by benchmarking precise methodological and empirical contributions against Chinese and international literature for China Economic Quarterly.
Tailored for manuscripts submitted to China Economic Quarterly (《经济学(季刊)》), this skill helps researchers transform generic literature surveys into sharp, defensible contribution statements. It eliminates empty academic cliches like 'fills a domestic gap' by guiding authors to benchmark exact methodological, causal, and mechanism differences against 1-3 baseline international and Chinese field papers. It ensures proper citation of foundational econometrics literature and prepares manuscripts for rigorous peer review by overseas-trained referees.
Key Features
011,074 GitHub stars
02Classifies paper contributions into credible identification, explicit mechanisms, new parameters, or methodological templates
03Integrates foundational international theoretical and econometric sources with domestic empirical evidence
04Diagnoses common literature review referee objections and provides targeted revision templates
05Transforms chronological literature lists into concrete delta-based contribution statements
06Provides a standardized self-check checklist and structured output format before identification design
Use Cases
01Benchmarking identification strategies against top English and Chinese field literature during drafting
02Refining the introduction and literature review section of a China Economic Quarterly (CEQ) submission
03Addressing referee feedback concerning international dialogue, misread citations, or vague novelty claims