Is the feedback tone appropriate for professional teams?

The skill uses a specific constructive feedback formula designed to be objective and helpful, favoring suggestions like 'Consider...' over 'You should...' to maintain a positive team culture.

Can it detect specific code smells or anti-patterns?

Yes, it includes a detailed anti-pattern catalog for methods (like Long Methods), classes (like God Objects), and architecture (like Circular Dependencies).

Does it support security and performance audits?

Security and performance are two of the core dimensions evaluated, covering input validation, data exposure, algorithmic complexity, and I/O optimization.

Code Quality Reviewer

Name: Code Quality Reviewer
Author: rsmdt

byrsmdt

•

140

Collaboration Tools

Conducts systematic code reviews using structured patterns to identify anti-patterns, security risks, and technical debt while providing constructive feedback.

About

The Code Quality Review skill empowers Claude to perform deep, multi-dimensional assessments of codebases based on industry best practices. It evaluates code across six key dimensions—correctness, design, readability, security, performance, and testability—while identifying common anti-patterns like God Objects or Long Methods. By following a structured feedback formula, it ensures that suggestions are actionable and educational, helping teams maintain high standards and mentor developers through high-quality pull request reviews and codebase audits.

Key Features

Constructive feedback generation using the [Observation] + [Why] + [Suggestion] formula
Comprehensive anti-pattern detection for methods, classes, and architecture
140 GitHub stars
Multi-dimensional evaluation across Correctness, Design, Security, and Performance
Prioritized findings to distinguish between critical security fixes and minor style nits
Standardized checklists for quick, standard, and deep architectural reviews

Use Cases

Providing educational mentorship to developers through high-quality, objective feedback
Automating comprehensive pull request reviews and merge request assessments
Auditing legacy codebases to identify and prioritize technical debt

About

Key Features

Constructive feedback generation using the [Observation] + [Why] + [Suggestion] formula
Comprehensive anti-pattern detection for methods, classes, and architecture
140 GitHub stars
Multi-dimensional evaluation across Correctness, Design, Security, and Performance
Prioritized findings to distinguish between critical security fixes and minor style nits
Standardized checklists for quick, standard, and deep architectural reviews

Use Cases

Providing educational mentorship to developers through high-quality, objective feedback
Automating comprehensive pull request reviews and merge request assessments
Auditing legacy codebases to identify and prioritize technical debt