Does it support GitHub-specific review workflows?

Yes, it includes specific instructions for replying directly to inline comment threads via the GitHub API rather than posting top-level comments.

Will Claude push back on my code review suggestions?

Yes, if a suggestion is technically incorrect, violates YAGNI, or conflicts with the existing codebase, Claude is instructed to provide reasoned technical pushback.

What happens if I give Claude unclear or partial feedback?

The skill mandates that Claude stops and asks for clarification on all unclear items before implementing any part of the feedback to avoid related errors.

How does this skill change Claude's communication style during reviews?

It removes performative phrases like 'You're absolutely right' or 'Great point' in favor of factual technical acknowledgments and direct code actions.

Why does this skill forbid 'thank you' and expressions of gratitude?

To prioritize technical rigor and efficiency; the skill operates on the principle that actions speak louder than words and tokens should be reserved for technical content.

Code Review Reception

Name: Code Review Reception
Author: saar120

bysaar120

0•

Collaboration Tools

Enforces technical rigor and verification when processing code review feedback to ensure architectural integrity over performative agreement.

The Code Review Reception skill provides a structured framework for Claude to handle feedback with clinical precision. It eliminates performative politeness and reflexive agreement, instead mandating a 'verify-before-implement' workflow. This skill ensures that every suggestion is evaluated against codebase reality, checked for YAGNI (You Ain't Gonna Need It) principles, and clarified before execution. By prioritizing technical reasoning and evidence-based implementation, it helps maintain high code quality and prevents the introduction of unnecessary features or breaking changes often caused by miscommunication during the review process.

Key Features

01Systematic six-step response pattern: Read, Understand, Verify, Evaluate, Respond, and Implement.

020 GitHub stars

03Strict YAGNI verification to prevent the implementation of unused or unnecessary 'professional' features.

04Structured clarification protocols that halt implementation until all feedback items are understood.

05Elimination of performative language and gratitude expressions to maintain technical focus.

06Context-aware handling of feedback from both primary partners and external reviewers.

Use Cases

01Maintaining codebase standards when receiving suggestions that conflict with established architectural patterns.

02Resolving ambiguous or contradictory instructions from multiple stakeholders during the review cycle.

03Processing complex, multi-item feedback on GitHub Pull Requests with technical pushback where necessary.

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add saar120/skillgate-registry receiving-code-review

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT

Key Features

01Systematic six-step response pattern: Read, Understand, Verify, Evaluate, Respond, and Implement.

020 GitHub stars

03Strict YAGNI verification to prevent the implementation of unused or unnecessary 'professional' features.

04Structured clarification protocols that halt implementation until all feedback items are understood.

05Elimination of performative language and gratitude expressions to maintain technical focus.

06Context-aware handling of feedback from both primary partners and external reviewers.

Use Cases

01Maintaining codebase standards when receiving suggestions that conflict with established architectural patterns.

02Resolving ambiguous or contradictory instructions from multiple stakeholders during the review cycle.

03Processing complex, multi-item feedback on GitHub Pull Requests with technical pushback where necessary.