How does the skill prevent context drift during long processing sessions?

It implements a mandatory Context Refresh Protocol, requiring the agent to re-read its core instruction file after every five tasks to prevent hallucination or rule forgetting.

Why are scripts forbidden during the analysis phase of this skill?

To ensure forensic accuracy, the skill mandates manual evaluation of text blocks to detect implicit pressure or context that keyword-based regex scripts would likely miss.

What is the primary role of the Coercion & Duress skill?

It acts as a specialized digital clerk for identifying and indexing evidence of forced surrenders, illegal pressure, and procedural irregularities in historical document archives.

What happens if a document has poor OCR quality or garbled text?

The skill includes a built-in flagging protocol that identifies OCR failures and automatically routes the source file to a Vision Pipeline for manual re-processing.

How does it ensure the reliability of extracted data?

The skill follows a 'Clerk Standard' which strictly prohibits opinions or legal conclusions, requiring only verbatim quotes, factual summaries, and verified metadata.

Coercion & Duress Evidence Clerk

Name: Coercion & Duress Evidence Clerk
Author: ACSKamloops

byACSKamloops

Data Science & ML

Analyzes historical document archives to identify and index evidence of forced surrenders, threats, and procedural irregularities with legal-grade precision.

About

The Coercion & Duress skill is a specialized forensic analysis tool designed for the Secwépemc Hunting Society Cultural Archive (shs-engine). It transforms Claude into a high-reliability clerk capable of processing massive document batches to identify evidence of illegal pressure, lack of informed consent, and procedural misconduct. By enforcing a strict manual evaluation protocol and a 'zero-opinion' factual standard, this skill ensures that all extracted evidence—ranging from signatures obtained under questionable circumstances to the language of threat—is recorded with the integrity required for legal audit trails and historical documentation.

Key Features

Manual semantic analysis of historical document JSON tasks to detect implicit pressure.
Legal-grade verbatim extraction and page-anchoring protocols for evidentiary reliability.
Strict metadata validation for document IDs, titles, and 4-digit year formats.
Zero-tolerance protocol for hallucinations, banning speculative language and opinions.
Automated flagging system for OCR failures and provenance verification issues.
0 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Auditing legal archives for signatures obtained without proper interpretation or informed consent.
Identifying coerced land surrenders within historical commission records and letters.
Creating forensic audit trails for cultural heritage document processing and indexing.

About

Key Features

Manual semantic analysis of historical document JSON tasks to detect implicit pressure.
Legal-grade verbatim extraction and page-anchoring protocols for evidentiary reliability.
Strict metadata validation for document IDs, titles, and 4-digit year formats.
Zero-tolerance protocol for hallucinations, banning speculative language and opinions.
Automated flagging system for OCR failures and provenance verification issues.
0 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Auditing legal archives for signatures obtained without proper interpretation or informed consent.
Identifying coerced land surrenders within historical commission records and letters.
Creating forensic audit trails for cultural heritage document processing and indexing.