How does synthesis differ from a simple compromise?

Unlike a 'split the difference' compromise, synthesis finds a higher-order approach that honors the core principles of both sides while explicitly managing new tradeoffs.

What kind of synthesis patterns does the skill provide?

The skill includes patterns like Temporal (sequencing), Conditional (context-based), and Dimensional (separating axes) to find nuanced resolutions beyond simple averaging.

When should I use the Dialectical Mapping skill?

Use it when stuck in a binary choice, dealing with polarized stakeholders, or facing complex design tradeoffs where neither side is clearly superior.

What is steelmanning in this context?

Steelmanning involves presenting an opponent's argument in its strongest, most charitable form to ensure the synthesis addresses the best possible version of that view.

Dialectical Mapping & Steelmanning

Name: Dialectical Mapping & Steelmanning
Author: lyndonkl

bylyndonkl

•

Productivity & Workflow

Resolves polarized debates and false dichotomies by identifying strongest arguments for opposing views to synthesize principled, higher-order solutions.

About

This skill enables Claude to move beyond binary 'A vs B' choices by applying a rigorous three-step reasoning process: steelmanning opposing positions, mapping underlying principles, and synthesizing a 'third way' that transcends original constraints. It is particularly effective for navigating complex technical design tradeoffs, strategic business tensions, and policy conflicts where simple compromises are insufficient and explicit tradeoff analysis is required for high-quality decision-making.

Key Features

Multi-dimensional tradeoff and principle mapping
Standardized dialectical workflow tracking
Advanced patterns for temporal and conditional synthesis
Synthesis of higher-order 'Third Way' solutions
8 GitHub stars
Charitable steelmanning of opposing viewpoints

Use Cases

De-escalating polarized team debates by identifying shared underlying principles
Navigating strategic business decisions between growth and profitability
Resolving technical design conflicts like Monolith vs. Microservices architecture

About

Key Features

Multi-dimensional tradeoff and principle mapping
Standardized dialectical workflow tracking
Advanced patterns for temporal and conditional synthesis
Synthesis of higher-order 'Third Way' solutions
8 GitHub stars
Charitable steelmanning of opposing viewpoints

Use Cases

De-escalating polarized team debates by identifying shared underlying principles
Navigating strategic business decisions between growth and profitability
Resolving technical design conflicts like Monolith vs. Microservices architecture