FSE Author Response
Drafts structured, double-anonymous ESEC/FSE conference author rebuttals and journal-style Major Revision response letters.
Designed for software engineering researchers submitting to ACM ESEC/FSE and PACMSE, this skill guides authors through the distinct phases of peer review responses, including concise initial rebuttals and exhaustive Major Revision response letters. It enforces strict double-anonymity, generates detailed change ledgers mapping reviewer critiques to concrete paper edits, resolves common empirical pushbacks, and ensures no reviewer concern is left unaddressed during re-review.
Key Features
01Enforces strict double-blind anonymity across text, artifacts, citations, and metadata
021,079 GitHub stars
03Provides targeted strategies for common empirical pushbacks (validity, baselines, artifacts)
04Generates structured change ledgers categorizing actions as DONE, PARTIAL, or DECLINED
05Supports both concise initial rebuttals and exhaustive Major Revision response letters
06Formats outputs around critical decision dimensions to persuade Program Committee advocates
Use Cases
01Structuring journal-style change ledgers for PACMSE Major Revision re-reviews
02Drafting focused, evidence-based initial rebuttals during the FSE first review cycle
03Auditing rebuttal letters and artifact links for accidental double-anonymity breaches