Connect

ICDT Review Process Guide

brycewang-stanfordbybrycewang-stanford
•
1.1k
•
Learning & Documentation

Guides authors through the ICDT submission and peer-review process, covering two-cycle evaluations, revision strategies, and proof-correctness standards.

ICDT Review Process assists database theory researchers in navigating the International Conference on Database Theory (ICDT) submission workflow. It models the two-submission-cycle pipeline, details the criteria behind Accept, Revise-and-resubmit, and Reject decisions, and provides tactical guidance on addressing proof-correctness scrutiny from specialized program committees. Ideal for theoretical computer science and data management scholars, it helps authors optimize abstract bidding, strategize Cycle 1 revisions, navigate cross-cycle resubmission restrictions, and distinguish ICDT review dynamics from sibling venues like PODS, EDBT, and LICS.

Key Features

01Analyzes referee feedback focusing on mathematical proof correctness and bound tightness
02Prevents rule violations like uninvited Cycle-2 resubmissions and deanonymization
031,079 GitHub stars
04Models ICDT's two-cycle submission pipeline and first-cycle revision decision workflows
05Compares review expectations across ICDT, PODS, EDBT, LICS, and ICALP
06Generates structured response action plans to resolve identified proof gaps

Use Cases

01Strategizing paper timing and topic framing between ICDT cycles and venues like PODS or TODS
02Deconstructing reviewer comments to distinguish repairable lemmas from structural proof flaws
03Navigating Cycle 1 Revise-and-resubmit decisions by systematically resolving identified proof gaps