Connect

IEEE ICSME Review Process Guide

brycewang-stanfordbybrycewang-stanford
•
1.1k
•
Learning & Documentation

Guides researchers through the IEEE ICSME peer review lifecycle, from double-anonymous evaluation to early-decision cuts and targeted rebuttal writing.

The IEEE ICSME Review Process skill helps academic researchers in software engineering navigate the unique single-round review model of the International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME). It provides strategic guidance on handling double-anonymous reviews, interpreting early-decision cuts (Early Accept, Early Reject, and Response Recommended), drafting impactful rebuttals using existing artifact evidence, and understanding key differences between ICSME and peer venues like FSE, ICSE, and MSR.

Key Features

01Provides actionable strategies for 'Response Recommended' author rebuttals
02Analyzes reviewer packets across significance, soundness, and open-science criteria
03Identifies critical anti-patterns such as unfulfilled promises or anonymity breaches
04Breaks down the single-round ICSME review pipeline and early-decision cuts
051,079 GitHub stars
06Clarifies structural venue differences between ICSME, FSE, ICSE, and MSR

Use Cases

01Triage and post-review planning for rerouting rejected manuscripts to alternative venues
02Drafting focused rebuttal arguments for 'Response Recommended' early decisions
03Pre-submission self-assessment against ICSME empirical and maintenance standards