IJCAI Review Process Guide

•
1.1k
•

Navigates the IJCAI and IJCAI-ECAI two-phase peer review process, summary rejection risks, rebuttal strategies, and decision dynamics.

IJCAI Review Process Guide equips academic researchers with strategic insights to successfully navigate the IJCAI and IJCAI-ECAI conference submission lifecycle. It breaks down the high-stakes two-phase review model, highlights the mechanics of early summary rejections, details the hierarchy of Program Committee and Area Chair roles (PC, SPC, AC, SAC), and provides clear rules for drafting effective author responses. By identifying critical pre-submission readability vulnerabilities and clarifying strict confidentiality, conflict-of-interest (COI), and ethics policies, this skill ensures authors maximize paper survivability and avoid procedural missteps.

Key Features

01Maps decision actors including PC reviewers, SPCs, ACs, SACs, and Chairs
021,079 GitHub stars
03Assesses pre-submission readability risks for interdisciplinary and non-specialist reviewers
04Analyzes IJCAI two-phase review dynamics and summary rejection criteria
05Provides guidance on conflict of interest (COI) and official ethics escalation procedures
06Guides effective author response strategies without violating submission rules

Use Cases

01Formulating concise, rules-compliant author responses during the full review stage
02Pre-submission audit to prevent Phase 1 summary rejection by generalist reviewers
03Navigating reviewer conflicts of interest, confidentiality boundaries, and ethics queries