Journal of Applied Econometrics Review Process

•
1.1k
•

Guides researchers through the Journal of Applied Econometrics editorial workflow, submission rules, and peer review expectations.

The jape-review-process skill provides structured guidance for academic economists navigating the Journal of Applied Econometrics (JAE) submission and review pipeline. It details the single-blind review mechanism, Editor-in-Chief decision authority, the three-paper concurrent submission cap, and strict resubmission rules. By auditing common desk-screen failure patterns—such as lack of empirical grounding, reproducibility gaps, and page limits—this skill helps researchers avoid early desk rejections, prepare airtight replication packages, and formulate evidence-based response letters for revise-and-resubmit decisions.

Key Features

011,079 GitHub stars
02Enforces editorial constraints including the three-papers-under-review cap and no-uninvited-resubmission policy
03Audits manuscripts against JAE desk-screen criteria including scope, empirical grounding, and page limits
04Provides strategic guidance for drafting evidence-backed referee response letters
05Explains single-blind review rules and non-anonymized submission requirements
06Highlights mandatory replication and Data Archive deposit standards expected by econometric referees

Use Cases

01Structuring revision packages and response letters for JAE revise-and-resubmit decisions
02Pre-submission compliance checks before submitting empirical econometric papers to JAE
03Strategic planning for author teams managing multiple concurrent journal submissions