JAIS Review Process Guide
Guides authors through the JAIS editorial lifecycle, decision letter interpretation, and developmental review dynamics.
The JAIS Review Process skill helps academic researchers understand and navigate the editorial standards of the Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS). It provides actionable frameworks for interpreting decision letters, understanding the Senior Editor (SE) routing across seven submission categories, decoding developmental feedback, and prioritizing revisions based on SE synthesis rather than isolated reviewer critiques.
Key Features
01Decodes JAIS editorial decision letters across desk reject, reject, major revision, and minor revision outcomes
02Maps paper routing across JAIS's seven submission categories and their specific evaluation bars
031,086 GitHub stars
04Provides strategic guidance for engaging JAIS's distinctive developmental review culture
05Prioritizes revision actions by weighting Senior Editor synthesis over conflicting reviewer comments
06Delivers structured diagnostic outputs to formulate effective revision and rebuttal strategies
Use Cases
01Interpreting a JAIS decision letter to determine whether a major revision invitation has a viable path to acceptance
02Resolving conflicting reviewer feedback by aligning with the Senior Editor's synthesized priorities
03Pre-submission planning to align manuscript framing with category-specific Senior Editor evaluation criteria