Connect

JAMS Review Process Navigator

brycewang-stanfordbybrycewang-stanford
•
1.1k
•
Learning & Documentation

Guides researchers through the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (JAMS) editorial workflow, decision letter interpretation, and developmental review stages.

The JAMS Review Process skill equips academic researchers with structured guidance to navigate the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science's peer review system. It explains the Springer Editorial Manager workflow, the double-anonymized developmental review philosophy, area editor structures, and the mandatory dual threshold of theoretical and managerial contributions. Use this skill before submission to calibrate expectations or upon receiving a decision letter to parse editor priorities, cluster reviewer feedback, separate reframing from new data collection, and prepare appropriate next steps for revision or resubmission.

Key Features

01Prepares compliance steps for conditional acceptance including data and code availability declarations
02Analyzes the dual evaluation bar of theoretical rigor and actionable managerial relevance
03Separates empirical data collection requests from narrative reframing tasks for revision planning
04Parses and clusters decision letters to distinguish decisive editor priorities from secondary comments
051,086 GitHub stars
06Breaks down JAMS double-anonymized developmental review procedures and Area Editor structures

Use Cases

01Structuring revision timelines by separating new empirical studies from theoretical reframing requirements
02Deciphering an initial JAMS decision letter to plan a multi-round revise-and-resubmit (R&R) strategy
03Evaluating paper fit and routing settings in Springer Editorial Manager prior to initial submission