Connect

JCAD&CG Review Process Guide

brycewang-stanfordbybrycewang-stanford
•
1.1k
•
Learning & Documentation

Guides authors through the peer-review lifecycle, manuscript status tracking, and revision strategies for the Journal of CAD & Computer Graphics.

JCAD&CG Review Process Guide provides academic authors with an end-to-end walkthrough of the peer review workflow for the Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics (计算机辅助设计与图形学学报). It demystifies the entire publication pipeline from initial editorial screening and double-blind peer review to major/minor revision rounds and editorial board final decisions. Authors can accurately interpret online submission status codes, address common desk-rejection reasons, adhere to double-blind evaluation rules, and structure professional point-by-point revision responses.

Key Features

01Outlines common desk-rejection causes and double-blind compliance checks
02Provides a status dictionary to interpret online tracking messages accurately
031,079 GitHub stars
04Maps complete review pipeline from initial editorial check to final acceptance
05Offers professional communication etiquette and timeline management advice
06Guides structured major and minor revision workflows and response preparation

Use Cases

01Evaluating desk-rejection feedback to restructure manuscripts before resubmission or retargeting
02Planning responses and experiment supplements after receiving major or minor revision notices
03Tracking and interpreting submission status updates in the official JCAD&CG submission system