JLE Literature Positioning
Positions the marginal contribution of law-and-economics manuscripts against foundational literature and sibling journals for JLE submission.
Designed specifically for researchers targeting the Journal of Law and Economics (JLE), this skill helps clarify, sharpen, and defend a paper's marginal contribution against foundational canon (Coase, Becker, Stigler, Demsetz, Priest-Klein) and sibling journals (JLS, JLEO, ALER). It guides authors through a structured framework to categorize their contribution—whether a new answer, legal source of variation, institution, mechanism, or measurement—and formulate a crisp, honest delta in the paper's introduction to satisfy referees and editors.
Key Features
01Prevents anti-patterns like re-deriving established economic canon or overclaiming novelty
02Identifies precise contribution types across empirical answers, legal variations, mechanisms, and measurements
03Provides standardized response templates for common referee objections regarding novelty
04Applies the three-paper test to isolate open research frontiers from established findings
051,086 GitHub stars
06Differentiates JLE economic contributions from doctrinal (JLS) and organizational (JLEO) scopes
Use Cases
01Drafting the opening paragraphs and literature framing of a JLE manuscript introduction
02Differentiating empirical law-and-economics contributions from public, labor, or IO field journal angles
03Refining paper positioning after receiving referee pushback about incremental novelty