What kind of output can I expect?

It produces a JSON result containing metrics and a winner selection, while also creating a physical directory containing canonical artifacts for further analysis.

How do I provide data to the skill?

The skill accepts input via a structured JSON request schema that defines the paths and parameters for the two runs being compared.

What is the primary purpose of this skill?

It compares two specific workflow runs—one from an IDE and one from a CLI—to determine consistency, compute performance scores, and generate comparison artifacts.

Is the comparison process random?

No, the skill is deterministic, ensuring that the same inputs will always produce the same comparison results and metrics.

What version of workflow cycles does this support?

This skill is specifically designed to handle wf_cycle version 1.1 runs.

MOVA Workflow Cycle Comparison

Name: MOVA Workflow Cycle Comparison
Author: Leryk1981

byLeryk1981

Analytics & Monitoring

Deterministically compares IDE and CLI workflow cycles to calculate metrics, assign scores, and identify performance winners.

About

The MOVA Workflow Cycle Compute & Compare skill is a specialized utility designed to bridge the gap between IDE and CLI environments by performing rigorous, deterministic comparisons of wf_cycle v1.1 runs. By analyzing both execution contexts, it automatically computes performance metrics and scores, identifies the optimal run, and generates a standardized compare directory containing canonical artifacts for auditability. This skill is essential for developers using Codex automation who need to ensure consistency and quality across different development interfaces.

Key Features

Deterministic comparison between IDE and CLI execution environments
Automatic calculation of performance metrics and workflow scores
Generation of canonical artifacts for standardized reporting
0 GitHub stars
Automated winner selection based on predefined scoring logic
Seamless integration with Codex automation pipelines

Use Cases

Generating audit-ready comparison reports for workflow execution quality
Validating consistency between local IDE development and CLI-based automation
Benchmarking workflow performance to optimize development cycles

About

Key Features

Deterministic comparison between IDE and CLI execution environments
Automatic calculation of performance metrics and workflow scores
Generation of canonical artifacts for standardized reporting
0 GitHub stars
Automated winner selection based on predefined scoring logic
Seamless integration with Codex automation pipelines

Use Cases

Generating audit-ready comparison reports for workflow execution quality
Validating consistency between local IDE development and CLI-based automation
Benchmarking workflow performance to optimize development cycles