PODC Review Process Guide

•
1.1k
•

Navigates the ACM PODC review pipeline with expert guidance on proofs-first evaluation, double-blind policies, and strategic submission planning.

The PODC Review Process skill provides specialized guidance for researchers submitting papers to the ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing (PODC). It details the single-shot, proofs-first evaluation workflow, explaining HotCRP lightweight double-blind standards, program committee reading practices, Brief Announcement track requirements, and crucial distinctions between PODC and related venues like DISC, SPAA, and STOC/FOCS/SODA. By focusing on pre-submission proof verification and transparent model assumptions, this skill enables authors to prevent soundness rejections and position their theoretical distributed computing results effectively.

Key Features

01Compares review expectations across sibling venues such as DISC, SPAA, STOC, FOCS, and SODA
02Provides actionable guidance on lightweight double-blind compliance and decision interpretation
03Evaluates submissions against reviewer axes including proof correctness, model honesty, and novelty
04Assists in track selection between regular 10-page papers and 3-page Brief Announcements
051,086 GitHub stars
06Models PODC's proofs-first, single-shot accept/reject review pipeline without revision rounds

Use Cases

01Interpreting PODC review outcomes and planning resubmission strategies to DISC, SPAA, or journals
02Auditing theoretical proofs and model declarations prior to the ACM PODC submission deadline
03Deciding whether to submit as a full regular paper or a Brief Announcement based on proof maturity