PPoPP Review Process Guide
Navigates the ACM PPoPP conference peer-review lifecycle, author rebuttal strategy, and evaluation criteria for parallel computing research.
PPoPP Review Process Guide equips researchers submitting to ACM SIGPLAN PPoPP (Principles and Practice of Parallel Programming) with actionable insights into double-blind review workflows, Program Committee and ERC evaluation models, and TPMS paper matching. It provides strategic frameworks for deconstructing reviewer feedback, drafting high-impact author rebuttals within strict word limits, distinguishing PPoPP criteria from adjacent venues like PLDI and CGO, and managing fallback options such as the automatic poster consideration track.
Key Features
01Evaluates submissions against core PPoPP criteria including concurrency correctness, scalability, and measurement rigor
02Provides triage frameworks for accept, reject, poster track, and revision decision outcomes
03Analyzes differences between PPoPP, PLDI, CGO, POPL, and ASPLOS submission scopes and expectations
04Guides HotCRP double-blind compliance, conflict declarations, and TPMS reviewer matching optimization
05Structures evidence-based author rebuttals designed to address reviewer critiques within word limits
061,090 GitHub stars
Use Cases
01Auditing parallel computing manuscripts prior to submission to identify missing baselines or weak scaling curves
02Rerouting rejected manuscripts to appropriate sibling venues like CGO, PLDI, ASPLOS, or POPL
03Drafting targeted author responses and rebuttals during the single-round PPoPP review window