Which framework is recommended for customer-centric products?

The Opportunity Score (from Dan Olsen's Lean Product Playbook) is the recommended framework for prioritizing customer problems based on Importance and Satisfaction.

What is the main difference between ICE and RICE?

RICE adds 'Reach' (number of customers affected) as a specific factor to the ICE formula, providing more granularity for larger teams and scaled products.

How do I calculate an Opportunity Score?

The Opportunity Score is calculated as Importance x (1 - Satisfaction), where both metrics are normalized to a 0-1 scale. High importance with low satisfaction yields the highest score.

What prioritization frameworks are included in this skill?

The skill covers nine frameworks: RICE, ICE, Kano Model, MoSCoW, Opportunity Score, Eisenhower Matrix, Impact vs Effort, Risk vs Reward, and Weighted Decision Matrix.

Prioritization Frameworks Reference

Name: Prioritization Frameworks Reference
Author: autostay-kr

byautostay-kr

•

Productivity & Workflow

Provides a comprehensive guide and implementation templates for nine industry-standard prioritization frameworks including RICE, ICE, and Opportunity Scoring.

This skill equips Claude with specialized knowledge on product management prioritization frameworks, enabling it to help teams select the most effective methodology for their specific context. It includes detailed formulas, 'when-to-use' guidance, and direct links to templates for frameworks like RICE, ICE, Kano, and Dan Olsen’s Opportunity Score. By focusing on prioritizing customer problems over feature requests, this skill helps users make data-driven decisions regarding product roadmaps, project backlogs, and strategic resource allocation.

Key Features

01Strategic advice on problem-centric versus solution-centric prioritization.

021 GitHub stars

03Detailed formulas for RICE, ICE, and Opportunity Score calculations.

04Direct links to Google Sheets and Slides implementation templates.

05Comparative analysis of 9 frameworks including MoSCoW and Kano Model.

06Guidelines for calculating Importance vs. Satisfaction metrics.

Use Cases

01Conducting quick triage of tasks using the Impact vs. Effort or Eisenhower Matrix.

02Calculating Opportunity Scores to identify high-value customer needs in the market.

03Comparing RICE and ICE to determine the best scoring method for a scaling product team.

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add autostay-kr/autostay-skills prioritization-frameworks

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT

Key Features

01Strategic advice on problem-centric versus solution-centric prioritization.

021 GitHub stars

03Detailed formulas for RICE, ICE, and Opportunity Score calculations.

04Direct links to Google Sheets and Slides implementation templates.

05Comparative analysis of 9 frameworks including MoSCoW and Kano Model.

06Guidelines for calculating Importance vs. Satisfaction metrics.

Use Cases

01Conducting quick triage of tasks using the Impact vs. Effort or Eisenhower Matrix.

02Calculating Opportunity Scores to identify high-value customer needs in the market.

03Comparing RICE and ICE to determine the best scoring method for a scaling product team.

What are Skills?·How to Install

Install with 🐟 Skill.Fish

npx skillfish add autostay-kr/autostay-skills prioritization-frameworks

For use in Claude.ai and ChatGPT