Psychological Review Topic Selection
Evaluates research concepts against Psychological Review standards to verify theoretical scope, generality, and journal fit.
The Psychological Review Topic Selection skill helps academic researchers, cognitive scientists, and psychologists screen prospective manuscript ideas against the rigorous standards of Psychological Review. It runs ideas through the empirical-contribution test to ensure the contribution is fundamentally theoretical rather than an empirical report, verifies scope across paradigms, outlines concrete explananda, and categorizes the research into one of four recognized journal routes—formal modeling, conceptual frameworks, theoretical adjudication, or generative synthesis—to prevent immediate desk rejections.
Key Features
01Submission route identification across formal models, conceptual frameworks, adjudications, and syntheses
021,090 GitHub stars
03Scope and generality screening across multiple tasks, paradigms, and theoretical tensions
04Desk-reject prevention by evaluating theoretical advances against named prior accounts
05Empirical-contribution gate testing to separate pure theory from data-driven empirical reports
06Explanandum and diagnostic phenomenon specification checklist
Use Cases
01Structuring a computational model or conceptual framework grounded entirely in existing published data
02Determining whether a research idea fits Psychological Review or belongs in an empirical venue like JEP or Psychological Science
03Formulating a theoretical adjudication manuscript to resolve conflicting predictions between standing theories