Does it rewrite my content for me?

No, Reality Check is a strategic advisor, not an editor. It identifies what's missing or broken and suggests specific fixes for you to implement.

What domains is this skill best suited for?

It is specifically designed for startup operators, founders, and product leaders, making it ideal for strategy, operations, and high-stakes communications.

Can I use this for technical architecture reviews?

Yes, the skill includes a specific Technical & Product Review mode that focuses on edge cases, scale implications, and integration points.

How does Reality Check differ from a standard AI prompt?

Unlike generic prompts, Reality Check follows a structured protocol to simulate domain expertise and stakeholder perspectives, focusing on structural gaps rather than minor edits.

Reality Check

Name: Reality Check
Author: dazuck

bydazuck

•

Productivity & Workflow

Pressure tests plans and strategies to identify critical gaps and structural flaws before they reach stakeholders.

About

Reality Check acts as a strategic sparring partner for founders and operators, providing high-level feedback on business plans, communications, and product strategies. Instead of nitpicking minor details, it simulates stakeholder perspectives and leverages domain expertise to uncover hidden risks, unvalidated assumptions, and missing context. It is designed to ensure work is battle-ready, helping users move from ideation to execution with confidence by prioritizing high-leverage improvements and actionable solutions.

Key Features

Structural gap analysis focused on fatal flaws and unaddressed risks
Actionable synthesis that prioritizes the top three highest-impact improvements
7 GitHub stars
Multi-mode review protocols for strategy, communications, product, and operations
Stakeholder simulation to anticipate potential pushback or objections
Dynamic domain learning to provide specialized, context-aware feedback

Use Cases

Vetting internal process changes or company-wide communications before rollout
Stress-testing a board presentation or pitch deck for logical consistency and impact
Reviewing a product roadmap to identify technical dependencies and missed edge cases

About

Key Features

Structural gap analysis focused on fatal flaws and unaddressed risks
Actionable synthesis that prioritizes the top three highest-impact improvements
7 GitHub stars
Multi-mode review protocols for strategy, communications, product, and operations
Stakeholder simulation to anticipate potential pushback or objections
Dynamic domain learning to provide specialized, context-aware feedback

Use Cases

Vetting internal process changes or company-wide communications before rollout
Stress-testing a board presentation or pitch deck for logical consistency and impact
Reviewing a product roadmap to identify technical dependencies and missed edge cases