Does this skill help with task management?

Yes, it integrates with workflows by ensuring that feedback is acted upon—fixing critical and important issues—before proceeding to the next task in your development plan.

What should I do if the reviewer subagent is wrong?

The skill encourages technical dialogue. If the reviewer provides an incorrect assessment, you should push back with reasoning, code examples, or test results to clarify the implementation.

When is the best time to request a review?

Reviewing early and often is recommended. Mandatory reviews should occur after major feature completions, after each task in subagent-driven development, and before any merge to the main branch.

How does this skill work with Git?

It uses git rev-parse to identify specific commit ranges (SHAs), allowing the code-reviewer subagent to focus its analysis strictly on the newly introduced changes.

Requesting Code Review

Name: Requesting Code Review
Author: jasir

byjasir

Collaboration Tools

Automates the dispatch of specialized code-reviewer subagents to validate feature implementations and identify technical debt before merging changes.

About

This skill streamlines the code review process within Claude Code by orchestrating interactions with specialized code-reviewer subagents. By utilizing git SHAs to isolate specific changes, it ensures that every task or feature is evaluated against original requirements and best practices. It helps developers maintain high code quality standards by mandating reviews at critical milestones—such as task completion or pre-merge—to catch architectural flaws and bugs before they cascade into larger issues.

Key Features

Automated subagent dispatch for targeted code reviews
Categorized feedback loop for Critical, Important, and Minor issues
Git-integrated SHA tracking for precise change analysis
Standardized templates for implementation summaries and requirements
Seamless integration with subagent-driven development workflows
0 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Performing incremental reviews after every task in a multi-step deployment plan
Obtaining a fresh technical perspective when stuck on complex refactoring or bug fixes
Validating major feature implementations against design documents before merging to main

About

Key Features

Automated subagent dispatch for targeted code reviews
Categorized feedback loop for Critical, Important, and Minor issues
Git-integrated SHA tracking for precise change analysis
Standardized templates for implementation summaries and requirements
Seamless integration with subagent-driven development workflows
0 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Performing incremental reviews after every task in a multi-step deployment plan
Obtaining a fresh technical perspective when stuck on complex refactoring or bug fixes
Validating major feature implementations against design documents before merging to main