What happens if there is conflicting feedback from multiple reviewers?

The skill flags conflicting feedback to the user, providing a clear explanation of the conflict and requesting guidance on which path to prioritize.

Does it support monorepo structures?

Absolutely. It uses advanced search tools like Grep and Glob to locate relevant files across complex repository structures, including the FlashFusion ecosystem.

How does the skill handle unclear or ambiguous reviewer comments?

The skill is designed to identify ambiguity during the parsing phase and will pause to ask the user for clarification before proceeding with implementation.

Can it run my project's specific tests after implementing changes?

Yes, the workflow includes a validation step where it runs affected tests and linting tools to ensure the new changes haven't introduced regressions.

Review Feedback Implementation

Name: Review Feedback Implementation
Author: Krosebrook

byKrosebrook

•

Collaboration Tools

Systematically processes and implements code review feedback, PR comments, and reviewer suggestions through structured task management.

About

The Review Feedback Implementation skill streamlines the post-review development phase by parsing feedback from pull requests or manual notes into actionable todo lists. It automatically navigates your monorepo to apply requested changes, ensures adherence to project-specific conventions, and validates implementation through integrated testing and linting. By breaking down complex feedback into atomic tasks, it ensures that no reviewer comment is missed and that all changes are verified before completion.

Key Features

Automated parsing of structured and unstructured reviewer notes
Systematic multi-file code modifications and refactoring
Real-time task tracking using the TodoWrite system
Integrated validation via test execution and linting (e.g., Ruff)
Context-aware handling of documentation, type hints, and unit tests
1 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Addressing a comprehensive list of requested changes on a GitHub Pull Request
Implementing architectural suggestions and refactors from senior developer feedback
Converting rough meeting notes or review sessions into structured code updates

About

Key Features

Automated parsing of structured and unstructured reviewer notes
Systematic multi-file code modifications and refactoring
Real-time task tracking using the TodoWrite system
Integrated validation via test execution and linting (e.g., Ruff)
Context-aware handling of documentation, type hints, and unit tests
1 GitHub stars

Use Cases

Addressing a comprehensive list of requested changes on a GitHub Pull Request
Implementing architectural suggestions and refactors from senior developer feedback
Converting rough meeting notes or review sessions into structured code updates